Projecte llegit
Títol: Anàlisi comparativa d'arquitectures de constel·lació LEO, MEO i híbrida LEO-MEO per a comunicacions segures en el marc del programa europeu IRIS2
Estudiants que han llegit aquest projecte:
FERRANDO DOLIU, DAVID (data lectura: 15-07-2026)- Cerca aquest projecte a Bibliotècnica
FERRANDO DOLIU, DAVID (data lectura: 15-07-2026)Director/a: FORNÉS MARTÍNEZ, HECTOR
Departament: FIS
Títol: Anàlisi comparativa d'arquitectures de constel·lació LEO, MEO i híbrida LEO-MEO per a comunicacions segures en el marc del programa europeu IRIS2
Data inici oferta: 19-07-2025 Data finalització oferta: 19-03-2026
Estudis d'assignació del projecte:
GR ENG SIST AEROESP
| Tipus: Individual | |
| Lloc de realització: EETAC | |
| Paraules clau: | |
| IRIS2; constel·lacions de satèl·lits; LEO; MEO; arquitectura multiòrbita; comunicacions segures; cobertura; latència; redundància; resiliència geomètrica; MATLAB | |
| Descripció del contingut i pla d'activitats: | |
| Overview (resum en anglès): | |
| The IRIS2 programme is the European Union initiative to establish a sovereign, secure and resilient satellite communications infrastructure. Due to the lack of detailed public information on the final system architecture, this project presents a comparative study of LEO, MEO and hybrid LEO-MEO constellation architectures aligned with the general objectives of the programme.
Several representative configurations are defined according to the main orbital parameters: number of satellites, orbital altitude and inclination. A geometric simulation model developed in MATLAB is used to evaluate the configurations over a 5 degree geographic grid and a 72-hour simulation horizon. The analysis focuses on three main performance metrics: full global coverage, minimum redundancy and maximum one-way geometric latency. The results show that a LEO constellation with 53 degree inclination provides good coverage over Europe but does not guarantee continuous global coverage, especially at high latitudes. Near-polar LEO configurations achieve full global coverage and low latency, while the MEO constellation provides global coverage and redundancy with fewer satellites but does not satisfy the low-latency requirement. The hybrid LEO-MEO architecture offers the best overall trade-off, combining the low latency of the LEO layer with the additional coverage and redundancy provided by the MEO layer. The study concludes that, within the assumptions and requirements considered, multi-orbit architectures provide a more balanced solution than single-orbit configurations for secure satellite communications systems inspired by IRIS2. |
|