Descripció del contingut i pla d'activitats:
A Catalunya, el nematode fitoparàsit causant de les majors
pèrdues de producció en cultius hortícoles és Meloidogyne spp. La
resistència genètica és altament eficaç per al control dels
nematodes i es pot utilitzar a través de conreus o portaempelts
que porten gen(s) R. Malauradament, hi ha pocs gens de
resistència comercials disponibles en cultius d'hortalisses. Un
altre tipus de resistència és la resistència induïda de les
plantes a resposta a estímuls d'agents biòtics i/o abiòtics. Hi
ha evidències de l'activació dels mecanismes de defensa del
tomàquet contra Meloidogyne per part de microosganismes, però se
sap poc sobre la capacitat dels mírids. L'objectiu d'aquest TFG
és determinar la capacitat d¿inducció de resistència de dos
mírids, Macrolophus pygmaeus i Nesidiocoris tenuis , en front a
Meloidogyne spp. Per a dur-lo a terme, es realitzarà un
experiment en testos i en cambra climàtica on s¿avaluarà
l¿efecte de la picada prèvia a la inoculació dels nematodes dels
dos mírids en solanàcies (tomàquet, pebrot i albergínia),
cucurbitàcies (cogombre, carbassó i síndria), compostes (enciam),
quenopodiàcies (bledes) i lleguminoses (mongetes) en la infecció
i reproducció del nematode
Overview (resum en anglès):
The nematode genus Meloidogyne has an extensive range of host plants and constitutes the main nematological problem in horticultural crops worldwide. Yield losses caused by Meloidogyne spp. have been estimated 15% to 60% in Mediterranean countries. Traditionally, chemical disinfectants such as methyl bromide were used systemically to reduce soil pathogens until their prohibition under Regulation (EC) No 1005/2009 of 16 September. Faced with this, the need to find alternative management is exacerbated and emphasis is placed on biofumigation, solarization, research into antagonistic organisms, the use of resistant rootstocks and the inducement of resistance from the crop itself. It has been documented that the repeated use of resistant Mi-1.2 rootstocks creates virulent populations, thus overcoming initial resistance. Therefore, plant-induced resistance does not compromise the environment and could play an important role in alternating management strategies against phytoparasitic nematodes. The presence of zoophytophag biological control agents such as the family Miridae has been shown to induce both direct and indirect resistance to beneficial plant preventing pathogenic microorganisms as well as phytoparasitic nematodes. The aim of the work is to verify whether Macrolophus pygmaeus activate induced tomato plant resistance either susceptible or resistant, thus decreasing Meloidogyne spp. infection and/or reproduction capacity. We had tomato plants for 48 hours exposed to 15 individuals of M. pygmaeus per plant with the help of a mesh, forcing the insect to feed on the plant's aerial tissue. We had 12 samples per treatment, being the control those that had no inducement of M. pygmaeus and having resistant plant, with the Mi-1.2 gene, of the Caramba variety and a susceptible plants of the Roma variety. We performed the same treatments for the Gadir population (Meloidogyne arenaria, M. hapla and M. javanica) and for the Agropolis population (M. incognita) both virulent, having a repetition of the experiment due to validate it. The inoculation was made on the same day that the M. pygmaeus were withdrawn, with second-stage juveniles at a ratio of 1 juvenile/ml. Tomatoes were held in a 26-degree controlled temperature camera and 16:8h photoperiod for 45 days with 200mL flowerpots. The results indicate that tomatoes previously exposed to M. pygmaeus have less infection of the nematodes of the genus Meloidogyne in the case of susceptible plants, but the difference were not significant in the case of resistant plants. Therefore, with an aim to verify the previous results and resolve what happens in resistant plants, we performed the same experiment, with the same virulent Agropolis population, with Maxifort resistant rootstock tomatoes, Cornabel commercial tomatoes and Maxifort- Cornabel grafted tomatoes. The results of the second experiment showed significant differences in infection in susceptible plant in the first experiment but another extension of the experiment would have to be performed to check what happens in the case of resistant plant and grafted plant as the results were inconsistent. However, is concluded that the phytophage effect of M. pygmaeus on susceptible tomato beans before inoculation of a virulent population of Meloidogyne spp. It acts as an inducer to the defenses of tomato plants and therefore nematode infection is minor. The interactions between zoophytophagous insects and nematodes is a poorly explored line of research, with many unknowns to be solved.